🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of respondents praising your insights on growing your business? Do recruiters reaching out to discuss opportunities?

If not, the reason could be your gender.

The Experiment: Changing Gender Identity for Increased Reach

Numerous female professionals joined a collective professional network test recently following viral posts indicated that changing their profile gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.

Some participants modified their professional summaries to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - inserting results-driven professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Based on reports, their visibility similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Brought Up

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether a built-in gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm favors male users who employ professional networking terminology.

Like many large social media platforms, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which posts appear to which members - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when determining post visibility. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" influence how posts perform.

Changing gender in your settings does not affect how your posts shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "a masculine version", reported remarkable results.

"The numbers I'm observing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, began experimenting after noticing her reach decline significantly.

The Process

• Initially, she modified her gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Lastly, she recycled previous content with comparable "assertive" language

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my posts were more personal - concise and clever, but also friendly and human," she stated. "Now, the masculine version was assertive and confident - similar to a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, stating "Every day I continued, and results improved, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Some testers experienced positive results. Cass Cooper who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her race to "Caucasian" reported a decrease in reach and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Broader Implications

These experiments occur alongside ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's unique role as both a professional network and social space.

Platform modifications in recent months have apparently resulted in women professionals experiencing significantly reduced exposure, leading to unofficial tests where identical posts by male and female users received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to classify and spread posts based on various elements, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

Company representative suggested that current reductions in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and less controlled."