🔗 Share this article

Picture this: a smiling Rasmus Højlund wearing Napoli's colors. Now, juxtapose it with a dejected the Slovenian forward sporting United's jersey, looking as if he's missed a sitter. Don't worry finding an actual photo of him missing; context is your adversary. Then, include statistics in a large, silly font. Remember some emoticons. Share it everywhere.

Would you point out that Højlund's tally features scores in the Champions League while his counterpart does not compete in continental tournaments? Of course not. Nor will you note that four of Højlund's goals came against Belarus and Greece, or that Denmark is far superior to Slovenia and creates many more chances. If you run online for a large outlet, raw engagement is your livelihood, Manchester United are the biggest draw, and context is your sworn enemy.

So the wheel of content turns. Your next task is to scan a 44-minute interview with the legendary goalkeeper and extract the part where he calls the signing of Sesko "strange". Just before, where he qualifies his remarks by saying, "Nothing negative to say about Benjamin Sesko"... yes, cut that. No one wants that. Simply ensure "strange" and "the player" appear together in the title. The audience will be furious.

This Time of Promise and Hasty Opinions

The heart of fall has traditionally one of my preferred periods to watch football. Leaves fall, the wind turns, the teams and tactics are still fresh, all is novel and yet everything is beginning to form. Key players of the season ahead are staking their claims. The transfer window is shut. No one is talking about the quadruple yet. All teams are still in the game. Right now, anything is possible.

Yet, for many of the same reasons, this period has long been one of my most disliked times to read about football. For while no outcomes are decided, opinions must be formed immediately. The City winger is resurgent. The German talent has been a major letdown. Is Antoine Semenyo the top performer in the league right now? Please an answer now.

The Player as The Prime Example

And for numerous reasons, Sesko feels like the archetype in this respect, a player inextricably trapped between football's two countervailing, non-negotiable forces. The need to delay final conclusions, allowing technical development and strategic understanding to mature. And the imperative to produce permanent definitive judgment, a constant stream of takes and jokes, context-free condemnations and meaningless contrasts, a puzzle that can not truly be solved.

It is not my aim to provide a in-depth evaluation of Sesko's stint at Manchester United to date. The guy has been in the lineup four times in the Premier League in a highly unpredictable team, found the net twice, and had a grand total of 116 touches. What exactly are we analysing? And do I propose to duplicate the pundits' notable debate "The Sesko Debate", in which two of England's leading pundits duel thrillingly on a podcast over whether Sesko needs 10 goals to be deemed successful this year (Neville), or whether it's really more like 12 or 13 (Wright).

A Harsh Reality

Despite this I enjoyed watching Sesko at his former club: a powerful, fast racing car of a forward, playing in a team ideally suited to his talents: given the license to attack but also the freedom to miss. Partly this is why United feels like the most unforgiving place he could possibly be at the moment: a place where "brutal verdicts" are handed down in roughly the duration it takes to load a pre-roll ad, the club with the widest and most ruthless gulf between the time and air he requires, and the time and air he is going to get.

We saw a case of this over the international break, when a viral chart handily stated that Sesko had been deemed – by a wide margin – the worst signing of the summer transfer window by a survey of 20 agents. Naturally, the media are by no means alone in this. Club channels, influencers, anonymous X accounts with a suspiciously high number of pornbot followers: everybody with skin in the game is now essentially operating along the identical rules, an environment deliberately nosed towards controversy.

The Psychological Toll

Scroll, scroll, tap, scroll. What are we doing to us? Do we realize, on some level, what this infinite sluice of aggravation is doing to our brains? Quite apart from the essential weirdness of playing in the center of it all, aware on a bizarre butterfly-effect level that each aspect about them is now basically content, product, public property to be repackaged and traded.

Indeed, partly this is because United are United, the corpse that keeps nourishing the narrative, a big club that must constantly be producing the strong emotions. But also, partly this is a temporary malaise, a pendulum of opinion most clearly and harshly glimpsed at this season, about a month after the window has closed. Throughout the summer we have been desiring footballers, eulogising them, salivating over them. Yet, only a handful of games later, a lot of those same players are already being dismissed as broken goods. Should we start to be concerned about a new signing? Was Arsenal's purchase of Viktor Gyökeres necessary? What was the point of another expensive buy?

The Bigger Picture

It seems fitting that Sesko faces Liverpool on the weekend: a team simultaneously 13 months unbeaten at their stadium in the league and somehow in their own state of feverish crisis, like filing a a report on a person who popped to the store half an hour ago. Too open. Their star finished. Alexander Isak waste of money. Arne Slot bald.

Maybe we have not yet quite grasped the way the narrative of football has begun to supplant football the actual game, to influence the way we watch it, an whole competition reoriented around talking points and immediate responses, something that happens in the background while we browse through our phones, incapable to detach from the saline drip of takes and further hot takes. It may be this player bearing the brunt at present. But in a way, everyone is sacrificing something here.